Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 30 seconds
The first version of Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in EPA v. EME Homer City Generation released to the public contained an embarrassing factual error. That's according to a law professor from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in a piece written for the Washington Post.
In the original version of Scalia’s dissent, which was eventually corrected, Scalia misrepresented the position of a party in another case about the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory authority: Whitman v. American Trucking Assns. The Supreme Court has since posted a corrected version of the dissent.